| Overview – Assemblies
& Meetings |
back |
| 2003
Board Meeting, Brazil |
 |
| Launch
of the Latin American Evaluation Network
2004 Board meeting in Sao Paulo, Brazil |
As part of our mission to support and strengthen international
and regional evaluation networks and societies the IOCE was pleased
to contribute to the launch event of the Latin American RELEAC.
The event took place in Sao Paulo Brazil. The IOCE
held a Board meeting to launch the event and offered suggestions
and shared experience from other evaluation communities world wide
IOCE meeting in Sao Paulo –
October 2 & 3, 2003
Attendance: Elliot, Zenda, Nino, Gloria, Marco, Barbara,
Nancy, Donna, Penny
INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION
FOR COOPERATION IN EVALUATION
WORK PROGRAMME FOR START-UP PERIOD
2003 - 2004
Introduction
All of IOCE activities must ultimately contribute
to the IOCE Mission, which is: ‘to legitimate evaluation and
to support evaluation societies, associations or networks so that
they can better contribute to good governance, effective decision
making and strengthen the role of civil society’ IOCE members
will have the opportunity to take forward this important mission
and make a real difference to the development of the international
evaluation community. The work programme of the IOCE for the initial
period following the Inaugural Assembly held in Lima in March 2003,
focuses on the launch and establishment of the new organisation.
In the course of preparations for the Inaugural Assembly many activities
of potential interest to evaluation societies, networks and associations
across the world were noted. At this start up stage,
the Board has decided to concentrate on activities that will ensure
the sustainable launch of IOCE. These are as follows:
| • |
Organisational and communications
infrastructure; |
| • |
Membership recruitment;
|
| • |
Launching debates and
forums. |
Organisational and communications infrastructure
This includes:
Legal incorporation of the IOCE.
The IOCE is being incorporated as a not-for-profit organisation
in Canada following widespread consultation with potential members
about the Constitution.
Raising funds to support start-up activities.
Discussions have begun with a number of potential funding bodies
to complement the contribution that IOCE members will make in the
future - significant but limited funds have already been promised.
Designing and setting up a website
that will act both as a communication vehicle for IOCE members and
contain downloadable resources and materials (including for example,
a virtual library, resource materials for evaluation societies).
Membership recruitment
Following the incorporation of IOCE, the organisation
will welcome members from different parts of the international evaluation
community. These include:
| • |
Full members which are
formally recognised regional and national evaluation societies,
associations and networks. These full members will have
voting rights and will determine IOCE policy at periodic meetings
of the general assembly. |
| • |
Associate members are
societies, associations or networks that are at an earlier stage
in their development. They might expect to become full
members once they are properly established. |
| • |
Institutional partners
that include organisations, public bodies and foundations that
support the mission and objectives of the organisation. |
Preparations for the first General Assembly of the
IOCE will involve close working with new and potential members to
make sure that their priorities are incorporated into future plans.
Membership fees for IOCE in 2005 will have 3 'bands'
based on UNDP national income (GNI) levels; and within each band
there will be a range to take account of different abilities to
pay even within a region. The final level of fee will be decided
in each case by member societies in discussion with the IOCE Board
members responsible in that region.
The 'low national income' band will range from
$200-$750 USD.
The 'medium national income' band will range from $500-$1500 USD.
The 'high national income' band will range from $1000-$3000 USD.
The overlapping nature of these bands recognises
that sometimes weaker societies in a high income region can be less
well resourced than stronger societies in a region with lower income.
In general only a proportion of the IOCE budget will
be covered by membership fees. We expect that more will be covered
by sponsorship; institutional members/partners; and income generating
activities
Launching debates and forums
Following the meeting of the IOCE Board in Sao Paulo
in October 2003, it was agreed that an important part of the start-up
activities of IOCE should consist of debates and the creation of
forums for IOCE members to discuss international evaluation issues.
In order to launch these debates a number of priority themes have
been identified which we believe are of shared interest among evaluators
internationally and where IOCE can help shape a new consensus.
These themes all centre on diversity and cultural difference. They
include:
| • |
Cultural diversity in
the theory and practice of evaluation |
| • |
Evaluation in specific
cultural contexts – how is it different in Asia from North
America? |
| • |
Evaluation, social justice
and human rights |
| • |
Cultural competencies
for evaluators |
One of the ‘obligations’ of IOCE membership
is that all members will select at least one IOCE theme and debate
it as part of its own Conference or workshop Programme. We hope
that IOCE will exchange reports of such national and regional debates
and produce combined reports that can be used by all IOCE members.
We will also include such topics on the website, e.g. through ‘online’
conferences and other events.
Forums to involve IOCE members in joint activities
will be encouraged at regional and inter-regional level. We are
especially keen to encourage multilateral activities – for
example links between Spain and Portugal and Latin American evaluators;
and between Francophone evaluators in Europe, North America and
Africa. Such forums could include study visits, joint ‘projects,
and the development of evaluation guidelines and codes of practice.
|